Why a book on transportation law? More than 14,000 sections of federal and
state law and administrative regulations affect transportation in the
state of California. These laws govern the distribution of more than $10
billion annually throughout our state. They have an impact on anyone who
drives, flies, sails, bicycles, or rides a subway or train, as well as
anyone who simply breathes air, can hear the noise from freeways, or who
lives somewhere that might one day be in the path of a proposed road or
under the flight path of a proposed airport.
Yet, as I am writing this, there is no book devoted exclusively or even
primarily to discussing and analyzing the transportation laws affecting
this state. Very few people outside of legislators, consultants, planners,
or lawyers who specialize in transportation have even heard of most of
these laws, let alone are familiar with their requirements. As a result,
when a question of transportation law arises (for example, which agency is
entitled to what funds from what state account to build a project), many
people must scramble through the rather badly-organized laws and
regulations, written over the last thirty years by various people with
conflicting aims and scattered across many different volumes, manuals, and
publications.1
This was the situation in which I found myself seven years ago when I
began working as an attorney for the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG), which is the metropolitan planning organization for
six counties in Southern California. Before taking this position, my areas
of specialty had been land use law and the California Environmental
Quality Act. On my first day my first task was to comb through federal law
and write a detailed memo defining a metropolitan planning organization,
listing all of its responsibilities under federal statutory and regulatory
law. The memo was due the following morning. I was told that management
hoped I would find this assignment challenging. I definitely found it
challenging—not only to my intellect, but to my sanity. Until that moment
I had never heard of an MPO and had no idea where to find the answer.
Other attorneys and planners at SCAG and in other transportation-related
agencies, as well as citizens trying to understand how transportation
plans and programs will affect them or how they should be constructed, are
often confronted with similarly confusing questions and deadlines.2 This
book is for meant for them.
Scope
When I first thought about writing the
book, I decided that it should consist of organized, detailed, and
readable analyses of all 14,000 sections of transportation law affecting
California. I had to scrap this idea when I realized that the handy,
one-volume reference guide I wanted to give my colleagues would turn into
a monstrosity ten or so volumes long. And during the two or three years it
took to put the book together, transportation law would change
considerably, forcing the rewrite of large sections (during the course of
which the law might change yet again). It soon became obvious that it was
not possible to write about everything: the line had to be drawn
somewhere. I then began to consider which of the 14,000 sections are most
important.
As I soon learned, which laws are most important depends on who you are. I
was working for an MPO, and many of its mandates came from the
"Metropolitan Planning" sections of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
and Efficiency Act or ISTEA,3 so I had come to think of these sections as
particularly important. A planner for a county transportation commission
in our region, whose job involved finding sources of state funds for
various local projects, thought that I should naturally focus on funding
issues. My boss at the time, who helped litigate an affirmative action
case on behalf of people displaced from their homes by construction of the
Century Freeway in Southern California, thought that the book should
discuss in detail civil rights laws relating to transportation. A friend
of mine who is a police officer felt that the statutes setting forth
penalties for drunk drivers were more important than all of the above,
since "no one gets killed by a poor transportation plan." Other
suggestions were more creative: A lobbyist for another transportation
agency concerned with rail projects wanted me to write "an underground
classic like Eraserhead." 4
Thus, there seems to be no universally-accepted standard for judging which
transportation laws and regulations are most important. The question then
shifted from "which laws are most important" to "who will find this book
particularly useful." I realized that I wanted to help the kind of people
with whom I've been working these last several years. For the most part,
they are people—whether lawyers, transportation planners, elected
officials, community activists, or just plain citizens—affected by or who
need to interpret federal and state laws and regulations concerning
transportation planning and programming ("programming" meaning allocation
of state and federal funds). Suddenly, I understood the book's proper
scope. Many others, of course, are influenced by a host of important
transportation laws: Police must understand Vehicle Code and Penal Code
provisions concerning speeding and dangerous driving; truck drivers are
affected by Department of Transportation regulations dealing with the
transport of hazardous materials; bus and subway drivers may be interested
in regulations involving drug testing, and so forth. But I am less
familiar with these laws or with the types of questions that people might
typically ask. Someday someone should write books for these people about
these areas of law, if they have not been written already.
So, to be of maximum use to my intended audience, I have tried to include
the following topics and materials:
- An overview of the major federal, state, regional, and local
agencies engaging in or that otherwise have an impact on transportation
planning and programming in California
- A summary of the major
federal and state statutory, regulatory, and guideline requirements
affecting the following areas of transportation law:
- Statewide transportation planning
- Regional transportation planning
- Federal sources of and programs for funding of transportation plans and projects
- State accounts and other sources of funding for transportation plans and projects
- Federal and state laws and regulations involving the programming of these funds
- Environmental limitations and requirements imposed on transportation planning and programming, including those pertaining to air quality and to environmental review
- Less detailed summaries of major civil rights requirements applicable to transportation programming and planning
- Appendices setting forth the text of major federal and state statutes, regulations, and guidelines affecting transportation planning and programming
- Other appendices containing incidental, but hopefully useful information about finding legal information (concerning transportation as well as other subjects) on the Internet, and a guide to reading (and writing) statutory and regulatory language
Readers should keep in mind that the discussions herein do not represent
the end of the research, but rather the beginning. Planners reading what I
have to say about the metropolitan planning requirements of ISTEA, or
environmentalists examining the discussion of air quality law, for
example, must then discuss among themselves (and, if at all possible, with
their lawyers) how these laws apply to the situations directly facing
them.
Discussion and citation of regulations and requirements is a gray area.
The time frame during which I wrote this book was problematical, since
both federal and state transportation law were in a state of flux. SB 45,
a California bill, which substantially changed the transportation planning
and programming process, was signed into law in late 1997, and a clean-up
bill (SB 837), consisting of mostly technical but a few substantive
amendments, was drafted and signed during this same period. Similarly, the
"Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century"(or "TEA-21"), which was
signed into law in May 1998, made substantial changes to federal
transportation planning and programming law. But each of these is included
in the book.5
It should be noted, however, that many important requirements applicable
to state and federal transportation planning and programming law are
contained in a series of administrative regulations (found mostly in Title
21 of the Code of California Regulations and Titles 23, 40, and 49 of the
Code of Federal Regulations). At this writing, these regulations have not
yet been amended to reflect the changes made by SB 45, SB 837, and TEA-21.
While the administrative regulations are legally binding (i.e., planners
and others must comply with the regulations as written), as a general
rule, in case of a conflict, the statutes (passed by elected legislators)
take precedence over the regulations (written by unelected bureaucrats).
The question thus arises as to which regulations still have the force of
law.
A second general principle of legal interpretation holds that two
inconsistent requirements should be construed in such a way that both of
them can be followed. Acting on this principle, I have discussed most of
the regulatory requirements in this book, but the ones that appear to
conflict with the new state and federal statutes are in italics. You
should check with your attorney (or with the appropriate state or federal
agency) before attempting to comply with, refusing to comply with, or
enforcing these italicized regulatory requirements.
1. The advent of the worldwide web, which contains in electronic
format the full text of many bodies of law, has helped somewhat, but it is
still difficult to tell if or when one has found all statutes and
regulations which apply to a question of transportation law. Step-by-step
instructions for searching for federal and state statutes and bills and
for federal regulations are set forth in Appendix I.
2. For some reason, people asking questions about transportation
law
almost always need the answer "right away." Hopefully, this book will make
it possible to provide faster (if not instantaneous) answers to at least
some of their questions.
3. 23 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq. The metropolitan planning requirements,
which were recently amended, can be found at 23 U.S.C. section 134.
4. An extremely unpleasant but fascinating 1970's cult film the
plot
of which, while almost indescribable, certainly has nothing whatsoever to
do with transportation law. Nonetheless, I recommend it highly.
5. Note that a series of "clean-up" bills adjusting TEA-21 are now
being drafted. This book does not reflect changes made to federal law by
these bills. Once the "dust has settled," (i.e., the U.S. Congress
finishes making its technical corrections to TEA-21), future editions of
this book will reflect the final changes.
|