Child care and early education are not considered a public
responsibility in American society, and consequently there is no
universal public system for child care as there is for education. In
California, cities, counties, school districts, and other public
agencies are not required to plan for or develop child care facilities
or services, or even to assess how new development affects existing
resources. While a local government may not prohibit a family child
care home, the state does not ensure that facilities and programs exist.
Instead, the availability of child care relies on the commitment and
leadership of local planners, public officials, community advocates,
and activist members of the child care “industry.” With that in mind,
this book describes how child care actually works in the state, and why
local governments can and do support its development and operation.
The primary audience for Planning for Child Care in California is
professional planners, but public officials, community services
departments in local government, housing and community developers,
students, and child care professionals/advocates may also find it
helpful. Since the planning field itself is too comprehensive to
describe here, and is already available to professional planners, a
limited and select list of resources for further reading for
non-planners is presented in Appendix B.
The book focuses on California’s laws and policies, with examples of
child care projects in cities and counties throughout the state.
Because several other states have parallel laws, regulations, funding,
and resources, many of the concepts, strategies, and models described
here may also apply to other regions. (In fact, other cities, states,
and countries have model initiatives that cannot be covered in this
book.) Some references to national resource agencies and information
sources are also included.
The reader may notice that the preponderance of illustrative examples
are from urban and suburban, rather than rural, areas. This reflects
two factors. First, built-out communities face greater challenges,
causing advocates and planners to be aggressive and creative in finding
solutions. Second, the concentration of need resulting from population
density, along with ready expertise and leadership in some areas, has
led to two decades or more of seasoned child care planning, advocacy,
and public education. As a result, built-out communities provide useful
models of policies and practices that have been established or revised
along with actual projects that have been built.
The book covers the need for child care in rural areas, as well as what
a rapidly (or soon-to-be) developing area experiences. Planners and
child care advocates can learn from built-out communities in order to
anticipate and avoid the consequences of the lack of early child care
planning.
The daily lives and futures of a community’s children and its families
are affected positively or negatively by the availability and
accessibility of high-quality, affordable child care and early
education. Whether one or both parents in a two-parent family are
employed, their children need programs that support optimal early
development and prepare them to be successful in school and life.
American society has an obligation to plan and provide these programs.
Planning for Child Care in California is organized in three parts.
Part I—Understanding Child Care provides a background on child care
that is important to the balance of the book. Chapter 1 explains the
role of child care and early education in American society and why
planners and public officials should support its development and
improvement. Chapters 2 and 3 define child care in all its forms,
describing the complex, diverse, and fragmented system of providers,
funding sources, and regulation that challenges the system’s ability to
meet the needs of California’s families. Chapters 4 and 5 offer a brief
history of child care planning in California, who the key players have
been, and information and strategies planners and advocates can use to
site and develop programs that meet a community’s needs.
Part II—Accommodating Child Care describes how local jurisdictions
support child care development and operation through land use policies
and regulations, providing leadership and dedicating resources. Chapter
6 identifies the roles local governments have voluntarily assumed when
public officials and staff recognize the importance of child care and
early education. It also discusses the importance of leadership in
directing and leveraging resources to meet a community’s needs. Chapter
7 describes child care policies as part of a general plan, with
illustrations from several jurisdictions. Chapter 8 addresses locations
appropriate for child care and concerns about land use compatibility.
Chapter 9 covers local zoning and permitting policies and practices
that assist or discourage the development of different types of
facilities. State laws that restrict local regulation—as well as tools
for planners working with prospective child care operators—are also
discussed.
Part III—Linking Child Care and Community Development addresses the
connections between child care and other community development
activities. Information about child care development factors—space
needs, cost, and design issues—is provided in chapter 10, along with
challenges and solutions for planners assisting with projects or
developments where child care may be a component. Chapters 11 through
15 offer both the rationale for and examples of child care linked to
housing, transportation, transit-oriented development, and transit
villages, as well as other uses.
Many planners, developers, and child care professionals are more
knowledgeable about specific topics, and this book includes references
to their work and numerous other resources. However, since no similar
compilation is currently available on the range of topics presented
here, Planning for Child Care in California may serve as a good
starting point for those seeking to support the development of child
care. It is organized and presented as a pragmatic tool for
professionals—public planners and child care specialists alike—and, in
a sense, as an advocacy statement.
The business of community planning is affected by myriad forces,
including laws, technical issues, funding, and politics. So, too, is
the business of developing and operating child care facilities.
Planning for Child Care in California is unique in explaining the
forces that act to constrain the development of child care, while
offering supportive strategies that recognize the goals and realities
of community development. Extensive and usable “best practices”
information—sample policies and tools, proactive strategies, and model
projects— from around the state will be a valuable resource for
planning, community development, and child care professionals and
advocates as they work to address the needs for child care and early
education in their communities.
Kristen Anderson
January 2006
|